longofest
Oct 2, 03:04 PM
jaw04005
Apr 9, 01:06 PM
bobthedino
May 2, 09:45 AM
Mr_Brightside_@
Apr 11, 12:14 AM
Eduardo1971
Nov 24, 02:52 AM
Thomas2006
Oct 3, 01:32 PM
rdowns
Apr 12, 06:21 PM
dukebound85
Apr 25, 04:20 PM
Full of Win
Mar 28, 06:39 PM
Burgess07
Apr 29, 03:09 PM
gekko513
Aug 2, 02:47 AM
Warbrain
Sep 12, 08:30 AM
Abstract
Sep 25, 10:29 PM
While I like Aperture's ability to "catalogue" better than Lightroom, I wouldn't choose Aperture over Lightroom right now just because it's better at importing from my camera and "cataloguing" --- not unless I take 500-1000 photos at a time. Lightroom can sort, although I don't like the UI as much. I like Lightroom right now because while not as fantastic as Aperture at sorting, etc, it's much much better at pp. I have literally SAVED a fantastic RAW photo of my girlfriend in tricky lighting with just the editing tools in Lightroom, and I surely could not do that with Aperture.
Lightroom is also faster.
So Aperture has fantastic sorting and cataloguing for those who take >300 photos, but rather poor at post-production (not much editing, and quite slow at what it CAN do).

Click on country names for

World Map Countries Names.

WORLD MAP WITH COUNTRIES NAMES

Outline maps world education

World Map with names of the

Labeled maps, with countries
Lightroom is also faster.
So Aperture has fantastic sorting and cataloguing for those who take >300 photos, but rather poor at post-production (not much editing, and quite slow at what it CAN do).
rhett7660
Apr 21, 11:22 AM
ericschmerick
Sep 28, 12:09 PM
JohnBossu
Mar 19, 06:22 AM
aswitcher
Jan 11, 05:08 PM
Warbrain
Sep 12, 08:47 AM
mw360
Apr 6, 08:15 AM
twoodcc
Apr 4, 09:36 AM
?algiris
May 2, 09:37 AM
Swift
Apr 15, 07:20 PM
twoodcc
Dec 10, 08:51 AM
docgraham
Jan 5, 08:58 PM